Slider

Science

SCITECH

AMAZING FACTS

NATURE SPACE

Psychology

Building ‘belt’ offers cheap, quick repair of earthquake damage

  • Cheap and simple technique created to repair earthquake damaged buildings
  • Technology involves strapping floors of building and works very much like a weight-lifter’s belt
  • Technique tested and effective on simulation of a major earthquake similar in scale to the magnitude 7 Haiti earthquake
Destroyed houses and cars following Haiti earthquake

Four years after the January 2010 earthquake, 145,000 people still remain homeless in Haiti.
A cheap and simple technology to repair earthquake damaged buildings – developed at the University of Sheffield – could help to reduce these delays by quickly making buildings safe and habitable.
Recent tests showed that a damaged building repaired using the technique could withstand a major earthquake – similar in scale and proximity to the buildings that collapsed during the Haiti Earthquake.
The technology involves wrapping metal straps around each floor of the building, which are then tensioned either by hand or using compressed air tools. It is designed for use on reinforced concrete frame buildings – a common construction technique used around the world, including countries like Haiti. Unlike other repair methods, it does not require expensive materials or a high level of technical knowledge, making it ideal for use in the developing world.
Lead researcher, Professor Kypros Pilakoutas, explains: “The strapping works very much like a weight-lifter’s belt, by keeping everything tightly compressed to reduce tension on the concrete columns of the structure. Concrete works well under compression, but not when pulled under tension and this is why it has to be reinforced for use in construction. When the reinforcement is faulty or damaged, it can be very expensive to repair.
“Our method not only makes the building stable again very quickly, but it increases the building’s ability to deform without breaking, making it more able to withstand further earthquake movement.”
The team tested the technique on a full scale, two-storey building, built according to an old European standard which has inadequate reinforcing to withstand earthquakes.
This construction is typical of many buildings in the developing world, as well as many Mediterranean buildings built before the 1980s.
The building was constructed on a specially designed ‘shaking table’ which can simulate ground movement caused by earthquakes. During the first test, the building was very near collapse following a small earthquake similar in scale to a magnitude 4 on the Richter scale having about 10000 times less energy than the Haiti earthquake.
The building was then repaired using the post-tensioned metal straps and retested. The researchers were unable to make the building fail during a major earthquake similar in scale to the magnitude 7 Haiti earthquake at the epicentre and stopped the test at that point.
Professor Pilakoutas hopes the new technology will not only speed up the response to major earthquakes, but could also prevent the damage happening in the first place. The cost of the materials for a typical small building column is about £20 and it would take a crew of two people around two hours to complete the strengthening.
For a typical small dwelling having six columns, the seismic rehabilitation would cost around £200 and could be completed in a few days, rather than cost several thousand pounds and take months with other traditional rehabilitation techniques such as jacketing with steel plates or concrete.
“Ideally, governments shouldn’t wait until a disaster happens, but should be identifying buildings at risk and taking steps to make them strong enough to withstand any future earthquakes,” he says. “Because this method causes minimal disruption and is cheap to apply, it’s ideal for bringing existing buildings up to standard – both in the developing world and in earthquake risk areas in Europe as well.”
The research – funded through the European Union – is a collaboration between researchers from the UK, France, Cyprus, Turkey, Romania, Spain and the USA. The results from the shaking table tests are published in the Journal of Earthquake Engineering.

Additional information

1. The homeless figures in Haiti are taken from a press release from the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs in Haiti on 17 December 2013. 
3. The researchers involved are:
• Reyes Garcia, Iman Hajirasouliha, Maurizio Guadagnini, Yasser Helal, YaserJemaa and Kypros Pilakoutas (University of Sheffield);
• Philippe Mongabure (CEA DEN/DANS/DM2S/SEMT/EMSI, France);
• Christis Chrysostomou and Nicholas Kyriakides (Cyprus University of Technology)
• AlperIlki (Istanbul Technical University)
• Mihai Budescu and NicolaeTaranu (Technical University “Gheorghe Asachi”, Romania)
• Mihaela Anca Ciupala (University of East London)
• Lluis Torres (University of Girona, Spain)
• M.Saiidi (University of Nevada)
4. The experiments were performed on the AZALEE shaking table at the CEA/EMSI laboratory in Saclay (France), as part of the EU SERIES Programme (Seismic Engineering Research Infrastructures for European Synergies).

Structural Failures | Building Failures

Learn from mistakes made by others so you will not make the same for your projects

It was reported in June 2009, in Kuala Terrengganu, Malaysia, that the roof of a RM300 mil (US $90 mil) Sports Stadium collapse suddenly just after it was recently completed.

No one was injured, The damage was extensive, as practically the whole east wing came crush down at 8am in the morning, a few cars were damaged. The contractor was a South Korean Company while the Consultants were local Malaysians. The Repairs were carried and costs about RM35mil (US$10mil).
Since the works were still within the defects liability period which is usually 12 months or more for such a massive project, the cost of remedial works were borne by the Contractor. What other issues involved would be under the relevant authorities.
An Investigation Committee was immediately set up with involvement from the Public Works Department, Ministry of Works, Related Agencies, Experts, and an extensive report was later compiled.
Some of the photographs of the roof stadium collapse would be revealing :-
 Aerial View of Collapse Roof
Aerial Picture of the Collapsed Roof. Note that the other structures are intact, it is only the roof which failed and the roof is actually a Proprietary Space Frame Structure, and not designed and fabricated by local contractors on site. Note also that Space Frames are all Pinned Jointed and designed based on direct forces, tension or compression.




Collapse Space Frame Roof Part of the Roof Structure which shows the Space Frames involved


 Collapsed Roof Came Crushing Down

More pictures showing the extensive collapse of the whole roof.Note that Space Frames are interdependent on each other for strength. It is very weak and unstable until it is erected and forces are transmitted from top down. It is also very sensitive and any failure would be more of a "domino effect"



Roof Collapse on Stadium Seating 
Extensive Lives would have been lost had the Sports Stadium been occupied during the Malaysia Games ! Designers and particularly Structural Engineers must be acutely aware that any structures you do must never fail under any circumstances, as any failures could result in collapse and lost of lives, not to say very costly.


Part of Roof Collapse 


 Space Frame Collapse


Causes of Collapse of the Roof Structure

The Reports by the Investigation Committee highlighted a few factors which could have contributed to the failure of the roof structures as summarised below :-
  • The design was inadequate 
  • The roof was not erected properly resulting in misalignment
  • No quality control on Site
  • Materials and Workmanship not in accordance to specifications 
  • Alternative designs from Contractor was adopted without proper analysis
The above sounds too familiar and so common in our construction industry. Almost every sites are faced with these issues. In fact, structures are very resilient and would not have been catastrophic in collapse, even if under designed. The concept of limit state design takes account of this, allowing collapse to be progressive rather than catastrophic. Only steel framed structures are more prone to collapse especially during erection period, and particularly for 3D space frame structures.

The BIG Question is "Who is responsible for this?"

It is natural for everyone to point at the Contractor first and then the Consultants, but in many cases the Employer or Owner are to be blamed. Investigations can never be final and the cases will drag on for ages usually to the courts. The best approach is to AVOID this ever happening to you and your projects, whether you are a Contractor, a Consultant or an Employer. In almost all cases, this can be avoided.

Will WTC Spire Rise to Top?

Council on Tall Buildings to Determine if Structure Counts Toward Measurement

In the years after the Twin Towers were destroyed in the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, New York leaders vowed to build the country's tallest tower in their place as a show of resilience.
They're about to find out if they succeeded.
A council is set to determine next month whether One World Trade is the tallest building in the U.S.Associated Press
Early next month the nonprofit Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat—the accepted arbiter on matters of skyscraper height—is set to determine One World Trade Center's official "architectural" height. The developers of One World Trade, the site's signature tower that's set to open in 2015, say the Skidmore Owings & Merrill LLP-designed building measures 1,776 feet. That would be 325 feet taller than the roof of Chicago's Willis Tower, formerly the Sears Tower.
But the bragging rights to America's tallest tower aren't so straightforward.
At issue is whether the One World Trade's 408-foot steel mast is considered a "spire" that is part of the building's architecture. If it is found to be a structural spire, it counts toward the height; but if it is considered just an antenna, that would leave the building at 1,368 feet, the country's third-tallest, after the Willis Tower, at 1,451 feet, and the Trump International Hotel & Tower Chicago, at 1,389 feet.
The answer is subject to debate. "We are caught between a hard rock and a stone," Antony Wood, the Chicago-based building council's executive director, wrote in an email this month to landlord Douglas Durst, a part-owner of One World Trade.
The email points out that if the council, composed largely of top architects and engineers from around the world, rules in favor of the developer, it will upset a constituency that thinks the issue of defining height by a spire's reach has "got out of control." If it rules against the developer, it will upset "the vast majority of the entire USA public for whom the 1,776 symbolic height is sacred," says the email, which was reviewed by The Wall Street Journal.
The council's guidelines are brief, calling for buildings to be measured to their "architectural top," including spires but not antennas or other functional equipment.
Mr. Durst believes the answer is clear: "Logic and their guidelines dictate clearly that the building is 1,776 feet tall," said Jordan Barowitz, a spokesman for Mr. Durst.
Fueling the debate is a design change made last year. Originally One World Trade's mast was meant to have a geometric white shell. But Mr. Durst and the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, Mr. Durst's partner, dropped it from the plan over cost and maintenance concerns, leaving a steel structure not designed for public view, ringed by service platforms.
The decision sparked criticism from the building's lead designer, Skidmore's David Childs, who said at the time it was "unfortunate" that the Port Authority removed an "integral part of the building's design." He has since refrained from public comment on the issue, and Skidmore Owings has said it supports Mr. Durst's view.
Some onlookers aren't enamored with the current design. "It looks like it's been bolted on. … It does not look like it's part of the building," Pat Crooks, a tourist from Salt Lake City, said of the spire on Friday. She likes the design of the building, she said, but "the top is disappointing."
But Mr. Durst and the Port Authority say a tall spire was a key component of the design, regardless of its outer shell, and the mast should count toward the height of One World Trade, which was formerly named the Freedom Tower. The spire cost $21 million to build and install, according to the Port Authority, and the building's marketing material advertises One World Trade as the tallest in the Western Hemisphere—a claim that depends on the council ruling in its favor.
The decision also has broader reach than a standard skyscraper given its role in preserving and honoring the memory of those who died on Sept. 11. "The idea of building on this sacred ground the tallest building in the U.S. … is very important," said Joseph Daniels, president of the National September 11 Memorial Museum.
This isn't the first time emotions have run high over building heights. In the late 1990s, the Council on Tall Buildings sparked an uproar among Chicago architectural devotees when it ruled the spires atop Kuala Lumpur's Petronas Towers made them 33 feet taller than the Sears Tower's roof, thus ceding the world's tallest distinction to the new towers. Chicagoans noted that the highest usable floor in the Sears Tower was more than 100 feet higher than that of Petronas's highest floor below the spires.
Since, spires have become commonplace on skyscrapers around the world. And they are getting taller: The tall buildings council recently released a report noting that many account today for more than 30% of the total height, up from less than 10% in the 1970s and 1980s.
Architects at Skidmore Owings are scheduled to travel to Chicago to appear before the council's height committee on Nov. 8 to make their case. Peter Weismantle, an architect and the committee's chairman, says the architects "just have to prove to us that it's been designed."
Mr. Durst is angry with the council for even hesitating on an issue he sees as so clear cut. Mr. Barowitz, the Durst spokesman, said the council's process had become "politicized," and their determination "is being driven by a constituency that is offended by design changes that were necessary to make the spire feasible."
Mr. Wood, of the council, said that characterization was "ridiculous," as the criteria aren't specific enough to produce a clear-cut answer, and he expects a robust and intelligent debate over how to handle the tower's official measurement.
Even if the spire-versus-antenna issue is resolved, the building's height may not officially land at 1,776 feet: The council in 2009 changed its rules requiring building height to be measured from the top to the lowest building entrance. Given a slope on the site, One World Trade has an entrance lower than its main doors, which could put the height at 1,781 feet.

Akashi-Kaikyō Bridge, Kobe, Japan



Akashi-Kaikyō Bridge, Kobe, Japan

One of Japan’s greatest pieces of engineering, this bridge holds the record for bring the longest suspension bridge in the world with a total length of 3,911 m. It would take four Brooklyn Bridges to span the same distance. Opening in 1998, it took 12 years to build and it links the city of Kobe in Hyogo Prefecture to Iwaya in the Awaji Island. 

Funnily enough it was never built with the intention of being the longest suspension bridge in the world but in 1995 the Kobe Earthquake hit halfway during it’s construction and consequently added an extra 3 ft which gave the bridge its record. The length of the cables used in the bridge totals 300,000 km. That’s enough to circle the earth 7.5 times.

Burj Khalifa, Dubai

Burj Khalifa, Dubai

What can you tell me about it?

Completed in 2010, the Burj Khalifa is a skyscraper in Dubai, United Emirates. It stands at a height of 828m and has 163 floors for offices, apartments, a hotel, restaurants, a fitness centre, an 11 hectare park and an observation deck.

This vast project involved more than 380 skilled engineers and on-site technicians and was completed in six years.

Why is it important?

It’s the tallest building on earth!

And by a long way as well. It’s 200m taller than the CN Tower in Toronto, Canada, which previously held the title of tallest free-standing structure in the world. In fact, it took just 1,325 days from the start of excavation work for the Burj Khalifa to break the CN Tower’s record.

How was it built?

The Y-shape of the building is influenced by a flower found in the desert. The way this pattern is adapted to form the tower’s tapering, spiral shape helps air flow around the building and reduces the danger of high wind speeds on the structure.

Anything else of interest?

Dubai is very hot, which makes air conditioning the world’s tallest building even more difficult. Its cooling system, which is the equivalent of running 10,000 tons of melting ice around the building, creates 15 million gallons of condensation. This is stored beneath the building and can be reused to water the gardens in the surrounding development.

Building Design Cosiderations

Building Design

  • Environmental requirements
  • Structural requirements
  • Aesthetic requirements
  • Cost constraints
  • Dimensional constraints
  • Statutory requirements
  • Life of the building
  • Manufacturing and erection considerations

WALLS

Walls are the vertical elements of a building which enclose the space within it and which may also divide that space


Functional Requirements

  • strength and stability
  • weather resistance
  • fire resistance
  • thermal insulation
  • sound insulation

Form of Construction

  • Masonry (e.g. brickwalls)
  • Monolithic (e.g. concrete walls)
  • Frame (e.g. timber stud)
  • Membrane (e.g. sandwich)

Strength

Resistance to:
  • stresses set up by its own weight
  • superimposed loads
  • lateral pressure (e.g. wind)

Stability

Resistance to:
  • overturning by lateral force
  • buckling caused by excessive slenderness

PERFORMANCE

Weather Resistance

Provide adequate resistance to rain and wind penetration:
  • adequate thickness [for external walls, minimum 150mm - concrete; 225mm - brickwork]
  • adequate damp proofing means at critical position

Fire Resistance

Walls can act as Fire Barriers to compartmentalise a building so that a fire is confined to a given area.
They can separate specific fire risks within a building to form safe escape routes.

Thermal Insulation

Act as barriers:
  • to prevent heat loss to the environment (in "cool" areas)
  • to prevent heat gain (in "hot" areas)

Sound Insulation

Requirements to prevent airborne sound and impact sound:
  • external walls
  • internal walls (prevention of passage of sound from one space to another)

MATERIALS

Types of Bricks & Blocks

  • Clay bricks
  • Calcium silicate bricks
  • Concrete bricks
  • Clay blocks
  • Dense concrete blocks
  • Aerated (lightweight) concrete blocks

Types of Mortars

  • cement sand mortar
  • cement lime sand
  • cement sand with plasticiser
  • lime and sand

Brickwall Strength


Slenderness Ratio

The slenderness ratio of a wall and the eccentricity of the load will indicate whether the wall will crush or buckle. The greater the slenderness and eccentricity, the sooner buckling will occur.
Slenderness Ratio = (Effective length or height) / Effective width
effective width - least lateral dimension

Effective Length

The effective length or height of a wall depends on how the wall is held at its ends or points of lateral support.

Major Elements in a Building



Relationship Between Foundation and Loading



A Framed Building



Top