Slider

Science

SCITECH

AMAZING FACTS

NATURE SPACE

Psychology

India space mission costs only $ 75 millions while NASA's Space mission costs $ 601 millions

India's $ 75 million space mission, a triumph of low-cost Indian engineering

In a handout photo, Mangalyaan, Mars Orbiter Mission is prepared for its November 5, 2013 launch into space.
BANGALORE: While India's recent launch of a spacecraft to Mars was a remarkable feat in its own right, it is the $75 million mission's thrifty approach to time, money and materials that is getting worldwide attention.

Just days after the launch of India'sMangalyaan satellite, NASA sent off its own Mars mission, five years in the making, named MAVEN. Its cost: $671 million. The budget of India's Mars mission, by contrast, was just three-quarters of the $100 million that Hollywood spent on last year's space-based hit, "Gravity."

"The mission is a triumph of low-cost Indian engineering," said Roddam Narasimha, an aerospace scientist and a professor at Bangalore's Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research."By excelling in getting so much out of so little, we are establishing ourselves as the most cost-effective center globewide for a variety of advanced technologies," Narasimha said.

That is why so many multinationals have their research and design bases in India, he said, with "some bigger than our national labs."

Take college and university courses online completely free

Take college and university courses online completely free

Take college and university courses online completely free


In recent years massive open online courses (MOOCs) have become a trend in online education. The term was coined in 2008 by David Cormier, manager of web communications and innovations at the University of Prince Edward Island. The first MOOC was created the previous year, at Utah State University.
MOOCs are designed like college courses but are available to anyone anywhere in the world, at no cost. You do not receive a college credit, but you will receive a certificate of completion when you complete all coursework. The courses span dozens of subjects and are taught by some of the leaders in those fields. The courses are designed to be interesting, fun and rigorous; the courses are not just in science, and not just in English.
Coursera is perhaps the most well-known of the online education facilitators. Their latest numbers indicate that they have 17,000,000 enrollments from students representing 190 countries. There are 240,000
students in their most popular class. Coursera has over 400 courses in more than 20 categories, created by 85 Universities from 16 countries. Their courses are available in 12 different languages.
EdX is another non-profit course site created by founding partners Harvard and MIT and based in Cambridge, Massachusetts. EdX offers MOOCs and interactive online classes in subjects including law, history, science, engineering, business, social sciences, computer science, public health, and artificial intelligence (AI). It has partnerships with tertiary institutions in the U.S., Canada, Australia, the Netherlands, Sweden, Switzerland, Belgium, Germany, Hong Kong, India, Japan, China and Korea.
MIT has their own open courseware, where most of the materials used in the teaching of almost all of MIT's subjects are available on the Web, free of charge. They have more than 2,000 courses available. Stanford also has their own online and open courses. These are great options if you prefer to work at your own pace, as compared to structured classes like those offered at Coursera and EdX.
European institutions are also getting in on the act. Germany-based Iversity offers courses in both English and German and the first courses went online in October this year. Future Learn is a subsidiary of the British Open University and is currently in its beta stage. It already has partnerships with universities across Britain, Ireland, Australia and New Zealand. The courses will begin this coming November.
For those looking to learn a language Duolingo offers completely free language education. If you're interested in learning a valuable skill CodeAcademy teaches programming and coding in online, free and interactive lessons.
Other sites, like Open Culture, are not affiliated with tertiary institutions. On Open Culture, the editor finds the free courses and audio books on the web and hosts them on the site. The courses are audio & video and can be downloaded straight to a computer or mp3 player. 
This is by no means a complete list of all site and institutions that offer free online courses. http://www.mooc-list.com/ has many more listed.

The real reason for India’s brain drain

The real reason for India’s brain drain

We always come across reports of how much talented Indians are and are conquering the world in the field of technology & business. There are several reports suggesting that Indians dominate the technology industry of USA. 

But why are most of those Indians not in India but in US/UK? If we go a little more in depth to analyze this issue, we will begin to notice that the top Indian professionals & entrepreneurs today in US had actually left India during 1970s & 80s after obtaining their degrees in India. So, Why did we have such a severe brain drain in 1970s and 80s?
One common answer we get is that India did not have the right opportunities for their specialization. Maybe true for technical PhD holders who need employment from research institutes which might not have been prevalent in India. But what about entrepreneurs? They had a market of 0.7 billion ppl, something that nobody would like to ignore. Instead of going to a foreign land and toiling hard to become entrepreneurs, why did they not remain in India and do the same here? Afterall, India being a developing nation could have provided them a chance to experiment as well as capture marketshare.
It is easy to say that they were greedy, did not care for our country and flee to the US for greener pastures. But the real reason lies in the political & economic system.
This snapshot of the 1974 budget might give us some hints. During Indira Gandhi’s rule in 1970s, income tax was at an all time high with the top slab having a tax rate of 97.75% !!
tax_rate
If you were an entrepreneur and wanted to set up a business (obviously you want to make lots of money), would you be fine with doing business in such an economic condition? After a certain slab, for every profit of Rs 100 you made, you were supposed to part away 98 rs to govt and keep only Rs 2 for yourself. Would there be any incentive for you to work hard after you reach a certain profit level since anything you earn after that will not come to you anyway.
On top of the 97.75% tax, there were several more taxes like wealth tax, inheritance tax etc which when added up would exceed 100%!! It means after a certain slab, if you were making Rs 100, you were supposed to pay around Rs 103 in the form of tax!! Yes. It sounds funny but it was true. Entrepreneurs & businessmen who were making more profits were being “penalized” (in the form of exorbitant taxes) due to such policies.
Top businessmen like JRD Tata were actually selling a part of their wealth because for every Rs 100 they earned, they had to pay Rs 105 in the form of tax. (So, for every Rs 100 earned, they had to sell their existing assets worth Rs 5, add it to the Rs 100 earned and pay this Rs 105 as tax to the Govt).
Here is an excerpt from the book “India Unbound” by Gurcharan Das illustrating the same:
jrd_tata_taxes
EDIT: Some of the readers raised suspicion over the credibility of above excerpt from Gurcharan Das book because it just seems to be a “conversation” between Das and Piloo. Yes, many will find unbelievable that JRD Tata had to pay more that what he earned in the form of taxes. Hence, I am sharing another excerpt and this is from the book “Letters of JRD Tata” in which Mr.Tata himself has mentioned it in the chapter titled “Business Ethics”.
letters_jrd_tata_book
Link to the online edition of the book:
http://books.google.co.in/books?id=PVsORKIJimcC
And not to forget the sheer amount of running/lobbying one had to do to get hundreds of approvals to start a business in the license raj era. Here is an excerpt from an economics documentary which shows Narayana Murthy of Infosys venting out his frustration against Govt’s policies:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yRRqIZmz6iI
Also, such policies led to corruption in the system which forced honest businessmen to fled the country. For more information on the Govt policies, License Raj & the corruption due to it.
Here is an excerpt from “Accidental India” describing how Indira Gandhi’s “totalitarian rule” pushed Indian economy into dark age (Notice how even the most respected businessman JRD Tata vented out his frustration by making such strong statements against Indira Gandhi)
indira_mrtp
Here is an excerpt from “India Unbound” describing a case where such policies led to India’s loss and Indonesia’s gain:
birla_mrtp_rayon
If such powerful & respected businessmen like JRD Tata, Aditya Birla & Narayana Murthy were being penalized with such unreasonable taxes, “tortured” due to harsh bureaucracy and frustrated, imagine the plight of a normal entrepreneur. Wasn’t it much simpler to hire a taxi to the airport and get out of the country?
airport_taxi
We had a rapidly growing population and millions of engineers graduating out every year but no jobs were being generated because entrepreneurs had either left the country to setup their business abroad or were becoming stale here due to the above mentioned reasons. With jobs not matching the growing population, our graduates had no choice but to look for greener pastures where countries like US & UK were welcoming them with open arms.
We had entrepreneurs and professionals but the policies did not allow them to work here. Our talented brains & entrepreneurs did not leave our country, leading to brain drain. Our policies pushed them out. It drained them out!!

How does it help India if Satya Nadella becomes Microsoft CEO

How does it help India if Satya Nadella becomes Microsoft CEO

satya_nadella_ceo
Every citizen of every country in the world aspires to carry an identity to be perceived by others in the world. The Japanese are perceived to be efficient due to some of the legendary accomplishments of Japanese companies & their processes. Koreans are perceived to be hard workers due to the extra mile they go into every job they do. Kenyans & Ethiopians are perceived to be great runners due to the achievements in marathons. Americans are perceived to beinnovative due to the openness & entrepreneurial skills demonstrated by Americans.
Among all the countries, the case of India is interesting because what was once an economical & cultural superpower was hammered to oblivion in the past few centuries due to invasions & British rule during which the nation’s morale slipped into an all time low (or rather pushed down). India, which was the home to universities like Nalanda & Taxila and the epicenter of knowledge had become an illiterate, poor country by the turn of 20th century. India, which was immensely praised by travelers like Hsuan-tsang in 6th century, had ended up being perceived as a land of snake charmers by the time India got independence.
indian_snake_charmer
The world had perceived Indians as “dark natives” who were not even worthy to be trained for factory jobs. For example, here is an excerpt from the autobiography of Dr Verghese Kurien (Founder of Amul) in which he mentions about the humiliation he had to undergo during a meeting with the Director of an MNC (Nestle) who had thought that Indians would not be able to do a job even after training them for 5 years!!
kurien_nestle_argument
The above mentioned incident was not just an one off case but almost every Indian entrepreneur who had dealt with such foreign counterparts would share similar humiliating experiences between 1950s & 1980s.
However, India was never short of talent but the policies of Govts framed after independence had driven most of the intellectuals to greener pasteurs like America & Europe (Brain drain).
The following article explains the reasons behind brain drain:
http://guruprasad.net/posts/the-real-reason-for-indias-brain-drain/
Although a lot can be written about the negatives of brain drain, one cannot deny that it actually showcased Indian talent at global scale. Intellectuals graduating out of top institutions from India went on to scale peak levels in American companies and several reports suggest that Indians dominate the technology industry of USA.
Entrepreneurs like Bill Gates have openly admitted that they prefer engineers from Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) as they are found to be more talented than most of the other institutes in the world. 
During the IT revolution in late 90s and 2000s, most of the technology jobs from the US were being outsourced to India because India (rather than China) had established itself as a capable country which could handle knowledge based jobs at lower costs. Over the next few years, hundreds of offshore centers were also being setup including Research & Development in India.
Bangalore_India
A software tech park in Bangalore, India.
Apart from the outsourcing revolution due to which India is being recognized as an IT hub, the world is beginning to notice Indians as knowledgeable & capable as well. This is an identity which Indians would like to identify themselves with. Hence, whenever there is news about an Indian becoming a CEO of large American company (Satya Nadella recently became the CEO of Microsoft), there is jubilation in India because it is establishing the identity of Indians as knowledgeable & capable (Similar to how Japanese have established their identity for efficiency & Americans for innovation), and in the process, helping Indians gradually restore their confidence in themselves. That successful Indian might not be paying taxes to India and hence not contributing to development of India, nor would he be announcing special discounts to Indian customers, but his success would help the Indian psyche which is seeking ways to boost it’s morale and identity.
There is still a long way to go and many more milestones to be achieved. India has the potential to create it’s own Microsoft & Google. But in the meantime, whenever an Indian in some corner of the world achieves a major milestone, it reinforces the global identity as “Knowledgeable & capable” and thus calls for a celebration in India.

Panbam Bridge, Rameswaram Island/India



Panbam Bridge, Rameswaram Island/India

Both a road bridge and the cantilever railway bridge, though primarily it means the latter. It is the longest sea bridge in India at a length of nearly 2.3 km (2345 meters) and stands as a fine example of Indian engineering. The bridge was constructed with sufficient elevation and a beautiful scenery of the sea, adjoining Islands and parallel rail bridge below can be viewed from the road bridge.

Bridge was opened for traffic in 1914. Bridge contains vertical lift section and still it is functioning quiet well. It carries meter gauge trains on it, however, recently the Indian Railways are in the process of upgrade it to carry broad gauge trains. Structural Engineering Research Centre, Chennai - a premier national research laboratory in India, is handling this task.

Bhuj Earthquake India

Bhuj Earthquake India



Bhuj Earthquake India  - Aerial View
Bhuj Earthquake India – Aerial View

Gujarat : Disaster on a day of celebration : 51st Republic Day on January 26, 2001
7.9 on the Richter scale.
8.46 AM January 26th 2001
20,800 dead
Basic Facts
  • Earthquake: 8:46am on January 26, 2001
  • Epicenter: Near Bhuj in Gujarat, India
  • Magnitude: 7.9 on the Richter Scale
Geologic Setting
  • Indian Plate Sub ducting beneath Eurasian Plate
  • Continental Drift
  • Convergent Boundary
Specifics of 2001 Quake
Compression Stress between region’s faults
Depth: 16km
Probable Fault: Kachchh Mainland
Fault Type: Reverse Dip-Slip (Thrust Fault)
Location
The earthquake’s epicentre was 20km from Bhuj. A city with a population of 140,000 in 2001. The city is in the region known as the Kutch region. The effects of the earthquake were also felt on the north side of the Pakistan border, in Pakistan 18 people were killed.
Tectonic systems
The earthquake was caused at the convergent plate boundary between the Indian plate and the Eurasian plate boundary. These pushed together and caused the earthquake. However as Bhuj is in an intraplate zone, the earthquake was not expected, this is one of the reasons so many buildings were destroyed – because people did not build to earthquake resistant standards in an area earthquakes were not thought to occur. In addition the Gujarat earthquake is an excellent example of liquefaction, causing buildings to ‘sink’ into the ground which gains a consistency of a liquid due to the frequency of the earthquake.
Background
India : Vulnerability to earthquakes
  • 56% of the total area of the Indian Republic is vulnerable to seismic activity.
  • 12% of the area comes under Zone V (A&N Islands, Bihar, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, J&K, N.E.States, Uttaranchal)
  • 18% area in Zone IV (Bihar, Delhi, Gujarat, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, J&K, Lakshadweep, Maharashtra, Punjab, Sikkim, Uttaranchal, W. Bengal)
  • 26% area in Zone III (Andhra Pradesh, Bihar, Goa, Gujarat, Haryana, Kerala, Maharashtra, Orissa, Punjab, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, Uttaranchal, W. Bengal)
  • Gujarat: an advanced state on the west coast of India.
  • On 26 January 2001, an earthquake struck the Kutch district of Gujarat at 8.46 am.
  • Epicentre 20 km North East of Bhuj, the headquarter of Kutch.
  • The Indian Meteorological Department estimated the intensity of the earthquake at 6.9 Richter. According to the US Geological Survey, the intensity of the quake was 7.7 Richter.
  • The quake was the worst in India in the last 180 years.
What earthquakes do
  • Casualties: loss of life and injury.
  • Loss of housing.
  • Damage to infrastructure.
  • Disruption of transport and communications.
  • Panic
  • Looting.
  • Breakdown of social order.
  • Loss of industrial output.
  • Loss of business.
  • Disruption of marketing systems


    Top